Friday & Cox LLC
Search
Call Us Today for a Free Consultation: 412-668-4491
Email us for a free consultation Calls answered 24 hours a day
View our practice areas

Pa Supreme Court's Tincher Opinion and Its Impact on Product Liability Cases

Recently the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decided an important case in the area of product liability law.  The opinion in Tincher v. Omega Flex has clarified the Pennsylvania law in the product liability arena.  Product liability cases are those in which a consumer or user of a product is injured by the product.  The injured person usually brings a claim against the product's manufacturer claiming that the product which caused the injury was defective.  Product liability cases cover a wide range of products from drugs, automobiles, tools, to children's toys.  

In the Tincher case the Court was asked how an injured consumer is required to prove that a product was defective in its design.  The law had been unsettled prior to this decision depending on which court the claim was brought in, and as a result thereof the standard of proof the plaintiff needed to meet varied.  As the law stood prior to the Tincher decision, to determine if a product was defective the court would weigh the risks of the danger of the product against the usefullness or utility of the product.  The jury would then have the role of determining if the manufacturer of the product delivered a defective product to the consumer.  

The Court's decision in Tincher will still require the injured consumer to prove that manufacturer placed a defective product in to the marketplace.  The opinion given by the Supreme Court justices stated that the plaintiff may do this by either using the consumer expectation standard (that the danger is unknowable/unacceptable by the average, ordinary consumer) or by use of the risk vs. utility/usefullness analysis (a reasonable person would consider the probability and seriousness of harm to outweigh the burden/costs of precautions).  The question of whether the product was in a defective condition remains a question for the jury to determine, unless the issue is so clear that no reasonable minds could differ.  

The full impact of this decision will be determined as time goes by and new cases interpret the decision.  If you or a loved one has been injured by a defective product please contact our office for a free cases evaluation.

"'Tincher' Should Simplify Products Liability Cases", by Clifford A. Reiders, The Legal Intelligencer

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Email us for a response

How Can We Help You?

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Office Locations

Friday & Cox LLC
1405 McFarland Road
Pittsburgh, PA 15216

Phone: 412-668-4491
Fax: 412-561-4291
Pittsburgh law office map

Friday & Cox LLC
Phones Answered 24 Hours A Day